Table 3

Principle components analysis (oblique rotation) of 47 items of impulsivity: Parent and teacher ratings from Conners and SDQ questionnaires (CP, SP and CT, ST, respectively).

Part 2 -The cognitive form of impulsivity (factors 3 and 4)

Item
Descriptor
Factor 3
Factor 4

CP79
Easily distracted by extraneous ...
0.886


CP37
Fails to finish things started
1.000


SP15
Easily distracted, poor concentration
0.924


CP12
Fails to complete assignment
0.938


CP48
Get distracted even when instructed
0.827


CP29
Does not follow instructions through
0.872


CP80
Blurts out answers to questions
0.694


CP42
Has difficulty waiting in line
0.601


SP21
Thinks things out before acting
-0.818


SP25
Good attention span, sees ...
-0.961


CT26
Inattentive easily distracted

0.865

CT52
Distractibility, or attention span poor

0.858

ST15
Easily distracted, poor concentration

0.842

CT58
Easily distracted by extraneous

0.713

CT57
Does not follow instructions through

1.000

CT17
Fails to finish things started

0.922

ST21
Thinks things out before acting

-0.481

ST25
Good attention span sees

-0.958

Variance Explained
16.0
12.8

Eigen Value
2.53
1.07

Squared Multiple Correlation
0.87
0.88

Item-codes from scales include C, Conners; S, Strengths and difficulties; P, Parent; T, Teacher. The combination of factors 1 and 2 relate to the behavioral aggression component, and factors 3 and 4 relate to the cognitive impulsivity component. Note: If represented as the sum, each form of impulsivity explained 28–29% of the variance. As the informants' ratings correlated highly the true contribution of the components would be approximately halved.

Oades et al. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008 4:48   doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-48

Open Data