MEG event-related desynchronization and synchronization deficits during basic somatosensory processing in individuals with ADHD1Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada 2Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada 3Child Study Center, New York University, New York, USA 4Human Development & Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada
Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:8doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-8
Additional filesAdditional file 1: Example of a control subject's SAM peak locations and values during control (SAM peak value = 2.0) and active (SAM peak value = 16.3) states in somatosensory cortex Format: PDF Size: 529KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader Additional file 2: Example of an ADHD subject's SAM peak locations and values during control (SAM = 1.3) and active (SAM peak value = 15.0) states in somatosensory cortex Format: PDF Size: 523KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader Additional file 3: Control SI Frequency and Power Dynamics During Predicted versus Random Presentation of a Somatosensory Stimulus (A). Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for control subjects during Predicted presentation of a stimulus. The plot was baselined using the average spectral energy observed in the pre-stimulus period (-100 – 0 ms). (B) Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for control subjects during Random presentation of a stimulus. (C) Mean TFR differences between conditions. (D) Statistically significant values remaining once condition differences were thresholded to p </= 0.05. Format: PDF Size: 566KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader Additional file 4: ADHD SI Frequency and Power Dynamics During Predicted versus Random Presentation of a Somatosensory Stimulus (A). Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for subjects with ADHD during Predicted presentation of a stimulus. The plot was baselined using the average spectral energy observed in the pre-stimulus period (-100 – 0 ms). (B) Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for subjects with ADHD during Random presentation of a stimulus. (C) Mean TFR differences between conditions. (D) Statistically significant values remaining once condition differences were thresholded to p </= 0.05. Format: PDF Size: 556KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader Additional file 5: Control SII Frequency and Power Dynamics During Predicted versus Random Presentation of a Somatosensory Stimulus (A). Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for control subjects during Predicted presentation of a stimulus. The plot was baselined using the average spectral energy observed in the pre-stimulus period (-100 – 0 ms). (B) Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for control subjects during Random presentation of a stimulus. (C) Mean TFR differences between conditions. (D) Statistically significant values remaining once condition differences were thresholded to p </= 0.05. Format: PDF Size: 574KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader Additional file 6: ADHD SII Frequency and Power Dynamics During Predicted versus Random Presentation of a Somatosensory Stimulus (A). Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for subjects with ADHD during Predicted presentation of a stimulus. The plot was baselined using the average spectral energy observed in the pre-stimulus period (-100 – 0 ms). (B) Grand Mean TFR of the individual, virtual channel, spatially-filtered single trials for subjects with ADHD during Random presentation of a stimulus. (C) Mean TFR differences between conditions. (D) Statistically significant values remaining once condition differences were thresholded to p </= 0.05. Format: PDF Size: 566KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader |




on Google Scholar







author email
corresponding author email