Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Behavioral and Brain Functions and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Commentary

Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

Stefan Borgwardt1*, Joaquim Radua2, Andrea Mechelli2 and Paolo Fusar-Poli2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, CH 4031, Switzerland

2 Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Behavioral and Brain Functions 2012, 8:46  doi:10.1186/1744-9081-8-46

Published: 1 September 2012

Abstract

No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.

Keywords:
Guidelines; Neuroimaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Region-of-interest; Voxel-based morphometry; Meta-analyses