<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Behavioral and Brain Functions - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.commostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from Behavioral and Brain Functions (ISSN 1744-9081) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/33"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/24"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/26"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/9"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/25"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/23"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/30"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/27"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/3/1/42"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/3/1/13"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/33">
            
            <title>Fine motor skills in South African children with symptoms of ADHD: influence of subtype, gender, age, and hand dominance</title>
			<description>Background:
Motor problems, often characterised as clumsiness or poor motor coordination, have been associated with ADHD in addition to the main symptom groups of inattention, impulsiveness, and overactivity. The problems addressed in this study were: (1) Are motor problems associated with ADHD symptoms, also in African cultures? (2) Are there differences in motor skills among the subtypes with ADHD symptoms? (3) Are there gender differences? (4) Is there an effect of age? (5) Are there differences in performance between the dominant and non-dominant hand?MethodA total of 528 children (264 classified as having symptoms of ADHD and 264 matched comparisons) of both genders and from seven different South African ethnic groups participated in the study. They were assessed with three simple, easy to administer instruments which measure various functions of motor speed and eye-hand coordination: The Grooved Pegboard, the Maze Coordination Task, and the Finger Tapping Test. The results were analysed as a function of subtype, gender, age, and hand dominance.
Results:
The findings indicate that children with symptoms of ADHD performed significantly poorer on the Grooved Pegboard and Motor Coordination Task, but not on the Finger Tapping Test than their comparisons without ADHD symptoms. The impairment was most severe for the subtype with symptoms of ADHD-C (combined) and less severe for the subtypes with symptoms of ADHD-PI (predominantly inattentive) and ADHD-HI (predominantly hyperactive/impulsive). With few exceptions, both genders were equally affected while there were only slight differences in performance between the dominant and non-dominant hand. The deficiencies in motor control were mainly confined to the younger age group (6 &#8211; 9 yr).
Conclusion:
An association between the symptoms of ADHD and motor problems was demonstrated in terms of accuracy and speed in fairly complex tasks, but not in simple motor tests of speed. This deficiency is found mainly in the children with ADHD-C symptoms, but also to a lesser degree in the children with symptoms of ADHD-PI and ADHD-HI.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/33</link>		
			<dc:creator>Anneke Meyer and Terje Sagvolden</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2006, 2:33</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 387</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-10-09</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-2-33</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/24">
            
            <title>A randomized controlled trial of a novel mixed monoamine reuptake inhibitor in adults with ADHD</title>
			<description>Background:
NS2359 is a potent reuptake blocker of noradrenalin, dopamine, and serotonin. The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy, safety and cognitive function of NS2359 in adults with a DSM IV diagnosis of ADHD.
Methods:
The study was a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled, parallel group design in outpatient adults (18&#8211;55 years) testing 0.5 mg NS2359 vs. placebo for 8 weeks. Multiple assessments including computerized neuropsychological evaluation were performed.
Results:
There was no significant difference between NS2359 (n = 63) versus placebo (n = 63) on the primary outcome measure reduction in investigator rated ADHD-RS total score (7.8 versus 6.4; p &lt; 0.45). However, in subjects with the inattentive subtype, there were significantly more responders in the NS2359 group compared to placebo (41% versus 7%; p &lt; 0.01). For all secondary variables (ADHD-RS patient rated; The Conners Adult ADHD Scale; The Brown Adult Scale, and CGI-improvement scale) there were no significant differences between the two groups; however, in the inattentive subgroup, the response to treatment was significantly larger than to placebo. NS2359 improved composite factor scores of attention, episodic- and working memory. No serious adverse events were reported with insomnia, headaches and loss of appetite most commonly reported as side effects.
Conclusion:
No overall effect of NS2359 was found on overall symptoms of ADHD. There was also a modest signal of improvement in the inattentive adults with ADHD and cognition warranting further exploration using differing doses.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/24</link>		
			<dc:creator>Timothy E Wilens, Thorsten Klint, Lenard Adler, Scott West, Keith Wesnes, Ole Graff and Birgit Mikkelsen</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:24</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 342</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-24</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/26">
            
            <title>Additional evidence that contour attributes are not essential cues for object recognition</title>
			<description>It is believed that certain contour attributes, specifically orientation, curvature and linear extent, provide essential cues for object (shape) recognition. The present experiment examined this hypothesis by comparing stimulus conditions that differentially provided such cues. A spaced array of dots was used to mark the outside boundary of namable objects, and subsets were chosen that contained either contiguous strings of dots or randomly positioned dots. These subsets were briefly and successively displayed using an MTDC information persistence paradigm. Across the major range of temporal separation of the subsets, it was found that contiguity of boundary dots did not provide more effective shape recognition cues. This is at odds with the concept that encoding and recognition of shapes is predicated on the encoding of contour attributes such as orientation, curvature and linear extent.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/26</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ernest Greene</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:26</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 298</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-26</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/9">
            
            <title>The attention network test: a characteristic pattern of deficits in children with ADHD</title>
			<description>Background:
The Attention Network test (ANT) gives measures of different aspects of the complex process of attention. We ask if children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) will show a characteristic pattern of deficits on this test.
Methods:
The sample included 157 children (M = 10 years) who performed the child version of ANT as participants of the Bergen Child Study. Children with an ADHD diagnosis (N = 45) were compared to a group of children with other diagnoses (N = 55) and a group of children without any diagnosis (N = 57).
Results:
The group of children with ADHD showed low accuracy scores and a variable response set, indicating an inattentive response style. No differences were found between the groups on RT and accuracy measures of the alerting, orienting, and conflict networks. A high correlation between full scale IQ (FSIQ) and ANT measures was only found in the ADHD group. When FSIQ score was included as a covariate, the group differences were not statistically significant on any ANT measure.
Conclusion:
The present study showed that accuracy and variability measures rather than measures of the three attention networks conveyed the characteristic pattern of deficits in children with ADHD. The results emphasized the importance of including these measures to extend the sensitivity of the ANT, and the importance of reporting results both with and without FSIQ as a covariate.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/9</link>		
			<dc:creator>Steinunn Ad&#243;lfsd&#243;ttir, Lin S&#248;rensen and Astri J Lundervold</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:9</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 278</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-02-12</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/25">
            
            <title>Atypical cortical connectivity and visuospatial cognitive impairments are related in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome</title>
			<description>Background:
Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is one of the most common genetic causes of cognitive impairment and developmental disability yet little is known about the neural bases of those challenges. Here we expand upon our previous neurocognitive studies by specifically investigating the hypothesis that changes in neural connectivity relate to cognitive impairment in children with the disorder.
Methods:
Whole brain analyses of multiple measures computed from diffusion tensor image data acquired from the brains of children with the disorder and typically developing controls. We also correlated diffusion tensor data with performance on a visuospatial cognitive task that taps spatial attention.
Results:
Analyses revealed four common clusters, in the parietal and frontal lobes, that showed complementary patterns of connectivity in children with the deletion and typical controls. We interpreted these results as indicating differences in connective complexity to adjoining cortical regions that are critical to the cognitive functions in which affected children show impairments. Strong, and similarly opposing patterns of correlations between diffusion values in those clusters and spatial attention performance measures considerably strengthened that interpretation.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that atypical development of connective patterns in the brains of children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome indicate a neuropathology that is related to the visuospatial cognitive impairments that are commonly found in affected individuals.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/25</link>		
			<dc:creator>Tony J Simon, Zhongle Wu, Brian Avants, Hui Zhang, James C Gee and Glenn T Stebbins</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:25</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 264</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-17</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-25</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/23">
            
            <title>Context and strain-dependent behavioral response to stress</title>
			<description>Background:
This study posed the question whether strain differences in stress-reactivity lead to differential behavioral responses in two different tests of anxiety. Strain differences in anxiety-measures are known, but strain differences in the behavioral responses to acute prior stress are not well characterized.
Methods:
We studied male Fisher 344 (F344) and Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats basally and immediately after one hour restraint stress. To distinguish between the effects of novelty and prior stress, we also investigated behavior after repeated exposure to the test chamber. Two behavioral tests were explored; the elevated plus maze (EPM) and the open field (OFT), both of which are thought to measure activity, exploration and anxiety-like behaviors. Additionally, rearing, a voluntary behavior, and grooming, a relatively automatic, stress-responsive stereotyped behavior were measured in both tests.
Results:
Prior exposure to the test environment increased anxiety-related measures regardless of prior stress, reflecting context-dependent learning process in both tests and strains. Activity decreased in response to repeated testing in both tests and both strains, but prior stress decreased activity only in the OFT which was reversed by repeated testing. Prior stress decreased anxiety-related measures in the EPM, only in F344s, while in the OFT, stress led to increased freezing mainly in WKYs.
Conclusion:
Data suggest that differences in stressfulness of these tests predict the behavior of the two strains of animals according to their stress-reactivity and coping style, but that repeated testing can overcome some of these differences.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/23</link>		
			<dc:creator>Katarzyna Nosek, Kristen Dennis, Brian M Andrus, Nasim Ahmadiyeh, Amber E Baum, Leah C Solberg Woods and Eva E Redei</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:23</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 263</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-23</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/30">
            
            <title>Response variability in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a neuronal and glial energetics hypothesis</title>
			<description>1. Abstract
Background:
Current concepts of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) emphasize the role of higher-order cognitive functions and reinforcement processes attributed to structural and biochemical anomalies in cortical and limbic neural networks innervated by the monoamines, dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin. However, these explanations do not account for the ubiquitous findings in ADHD of intra-individual performance variability, particularly on tasks that require continual responses to rapid, externally-paced stimuli. Nor do they consider attention as a temporal process dependent upon a continuous energy supply for efficient and consistent function. A consideration of this feature of intra-individual response variability, which is not unique to ADHD but is also found in other disorders, leads to a new perspective on the causes and potential remedies of specific aspects of ADHD.The hypothesisWe propose that in ADHD, astrocyte function is insufficient, particularly in terms of its formation and supply of lactate. This insufficiency has implications both for performance and development: H1) In rapidly firing neurons there is deficient ATP production, slow restoration of ionic gradients across neuronal membranes and delayed neuronal firing; H2) In oligodendrocytes insufficient lactate supply impairs fatty acid synthesis and myelination of axons during development. These effects occur over vastly different time scales: those due to deficient ATP (H1) occur over milliseconds, whereas those due to deficient myelination (H2) occur over months and years. Collectively the neural outcomes of impaired astrocytic release of lactate manifest behaviourally as inefficient and inconsistent performance (variable response times across the lifespan, especially during activities that require sustained speeded responses and complex information processing).Testing the hypothesisMulti-level and multi-method approaches are required. These include: 1) Use of dynamic strategies to evaluate cognitive performance under conditions that vary in duration, complexity, speed, and reinforcement; 2) Use of sensitive neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, electroencephalography or magnetoencephalopathy to quantify developmental changes in myelination in ADHD as a potential basis for the delayed maturation of brain function and coordination, and 3) Investigation of the prevalence of genetic markers for factors that regulate energy metabolism (lactate, glutamate, glucose transporters, glycogen synthase, glycogen phosphorylase, glycolytic enzymes), release of glutamate from synaptic terminals and glutamate-stimulated lactate production (SNAP25, glutamate receptors, adenosine receptors, neurexins, intracellular Ca2+), as well as astrocyte function (&#945;1, &#945;2 and &#946;-adrenoceptors, dopamine D1 receptors) and myelin synthesis (lactate transporter, Lingo-1, Quaking homolog, leukemia inhibitory factor, and Transferrin).Implications of the hypothesisThe hypothesis extends existing theories of ADHD by proposing a physiological basis for specific aspects of the ADHD phenotype &#8211; namely frequent, transient and impairing fluctuations in functioning, particularly during performance of speeded, effortful tasks. The immediate effects of deficient ATP production and slow restoration of ionic gradients across membranes of rapidly firing neurons have implications for daily functioning: For individuals with ADHD, performance efficacy would be enhanced if repetitive and lengthy effortful tasks were segmented to reduce concurrent demands for speed and accuracy of response (introduction of breaks into lengthy/effortful activities such as examinations, motorway driving, assembly-line production). Also, variations in task or modality and the use of self- rather than system-paced schedules would be helpful. This would enable energetic demands to be distributed to alternate neural resources, and energy reserves to be re-established. Longer-term effects may manifest as reduction in regional brain volumes since brain areas with the highest energy demand will be most affected by a restricted energy supply and may be reduced in size. Novel forms of therapeutic agent and delivery system could be based on factors that regulate energy production and myelin synthesis. Since the phenomena and our proposed basis for it are not unique to ADHD but also manifests in other disorders, the implications of our hypotheses may be relevant to understanding and remediating these other conditions as well.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/30</link>		
			<dc:creator>Vivienne A Russell, Robert D Oades, Rosemary Tannock, Peter R Killeen, Judith G Auerbach, Espen B Johansen and Terje Sagvolden</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2006, 2:30</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 251</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-08-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-2-30</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-08-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/27">
            
            <title>Orthographic familiarity, phonological legality and number of orthographic neighbours affect the onset of ERP lexical effects</title>
			<description>Background:
It has been suggested that the variability among studies in the onset of lexical effects may be due to a series of methodological differences. In this study we investigated the role of orthographic familiarity, phonological legality and number of orthographic neighbours of words in determining the onset of word/non-word discriminative responses. 
MethodS
ERPs were recorded from 128 sites in 16 Italian University students engaged in a lexical decision task. Stimuli were 400 words, quasi-words (obtained by the replacement of a single letter), pseudo-words (non-derived) and illegal letter strings. All stimuli were balanced for length; words and quasi-words were also balanced for frequency of use, domain of semantic category and imageability. SwLORETA source reconstruction was performed on ERP difference waves of interest. 

Results:
Overall, the data provided evidence that the latency of lexical effects (word/non-word discrimination) varied as a function of the number of a wordas orthographic neighbours, being shorter to non-derived than to derived pseudo-words. This suggests some caveats about the use in lexical decision paradigms of quasi-words obtained by transposing or replacing only 1 or 2 letters. Our findings also showed that the left-occipito/temporal area, reflecting the activity of the left fusiform gyrus (BA37) of the temporal lobe, was affected by the visual familiarity of words, thus explaining its lexical sensitivity (word vs. non-word discrimination). The temporo-parietal area was markedly sensitive to phonological legality exhibiting a clear-cut discriminative response between illegal and legal strings as early as 250 ms of latency. 

Conclusion:
The onset of lexical effects in a lexical decision paradigm depends on a series of factors, including orthographic familiarity, degree of global lexical activity, and phonologic legality of non-words.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/27</link>		
			<dc:creator>Alice M Proverbio and Roberta Adorni</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:27</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 249</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-04</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-27</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-04</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/3/1/42">
            
            <title>Inefficient cognitive control in adult ADHD: evidence from trial-by-trial Stroop test and cued task switching performance</title>
			<description>Background:
Contemporary neuropsychological models of ADHD implicate impaired cognitive control as contributing to disorder characteristic behavioral deficiencies and excesses; albeit to varying degrees. While the traditional view of ADHD postulates a core deficiency in cognitive control processes, alternative dual-process models emphasize the dynamic interplay of bottom-up driven factors such as activation, arousal, alerting, motivation, reward and temporal processing with top-down cognitive control. However, neuropsychological models of ADHD are child-based and have yet to undergo extensive empirical scrutiny with respect to their application to individuals with persistent symptoms in adulthood. Furthermore, few studies of adult ADHD samples have investigated two central cognitive control processes: interference control and task-set coordination. The current study employed experimental chronometric Stroop and task switching paradigms to investigate the efficiency of processes involved in interference control and task-set coordination in ADHD adults.
Methods:
22 adults diagnosed with persistent ADHD (17 males) and 22 matched healthy control subjects performed a manual trial-by-trial Stroop color-word test and a blocked explicitly cued task switching paradigm. Performance differences between neutral and incongruent trials of the Stroop task measured interference control. Task switching paradigm manipulations allowed for measurement of transient task-set updating, sustained task-set maintenance, preparatory mechanisms and interference control. Control analyses tested for the specificity of group &#215; condition interactions.
Results:
Abnormal processing of task-irrelevant stimulus features was evident in ADHD group performance on both tasks. ADHD group interference effects on the task switching paradigm were found to be dependent on the time allotted to prepare for an upcoming task. Group differences in sustained task-set maintenance and transient task-set updating were also found to be dependent on experimental manipulation of task preparation processes. With the exception of Stroop task error rates, all analyses revealed generally slower and less accurate ADHD group response patterns.
Conclusion:
The current data obtained with experimental paradigms deliver novel evidence of inefficient interference control and task-set coordination in adults with persistent ADHD. However, all group differences observed in these central cognitive control processes were found to be partially dependent on atypical ADHD group task preparation mechanisms and/or response inconsistency. These deficiences may have contributed not only to inefficient cognitive control, but also generally slower and less accurate ADHD group performance. Given the inability to dissociate these impairments with the current data, it remains inconclusive as to whether ineffecient cognitive control in the clinical sample was due to top-down failure or bottom-up engagement thereof. To clarify this issue, future neuropsychological investigations are encouraged to employ tasks with significantly more trials and direct manipulations of bottom-up mechanisms with larger samples.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/3/1/42</link>		
			<dc:creator>Joseph A King, Michael Colla, Marcel Brass, Isabella Heuser and DY von Cramon</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2007, 3:42</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 213</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-08-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-3-42</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-08-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/3/1/13">
            
            <title>Determination of hemispheric emotional valence in individual subjects: A new approach with research and therapeutic implications</title>
			<description>Background:
Much has been theorized about the emotional properties of the hemispheres. Our review of the dominant hypotheses put forth by Schore, Joseph, Davidson, and Harmon-Jones on hemispheric emotional valences (HEV) shows that none are supported by robust data. Instead, we propose that individual's hemispheres are organized to have differing HEVs that can be lateralized in either direction.
Methods:
Probe auditory evoked potentials (AEP) recorded during a neutral and an upsetting memory were used to assess HEV in 28 (20 F) right-handed subjects who were either victims of childhood maltreatment (N = 12) or healthy controls. In a sub-population, we determined HEV by emotional response to lateral visual field stimulation (LVFS), in which vision is limited to one, then the other hemifield. We compare a number of morphometric and functional brain measures between individuals who have right-negative versus left-negative HEV.
Results:
Using AEPs to determine HEV, we found 62% of controls and 67% of maltreated subjects had right negative HEV. There was a strong interaction between HEV-laterality and gender, which together accounted for 60% of individual variability in total grey matter volume (GMV). HEV-laterality was associated with differences in hippocampal volume, amygdala/hippocampal ratios, and measures of verbal, visual and global memory. HEV-laterality was associated also with different constellations of symptoms comparing maltreated subjects to controls. Emotional response to LVFS provided a convenient and complementary measure of HEV-laterality that correlated significantly with the HEVs determined by AEPs.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest that HEV-laterality, like handedness or gender, is an important individual difference with significant implications for brain and behavioral research, and for guiding lateralized treatments such as rTMS.</description>
			<link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/3/1/13</link>		
			<dc:creator>Fredric Schiffer, Martin H Teicher, Carl Anderson, Akemi Tomoda, Ann Polcari, Carryl P Navalta and Susan L Andersen</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2007, 3:13</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 202</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-03-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-3-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
