<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Behavioral and Brain Functions - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Behavioral and Brain Functions</description>
        <dc:date>2012-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/55" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/8/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/44" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/31" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/46" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/8/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/15" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/3">
        <title>Music listening while you learn:
No influence of background music on verbal learning
</title>
        <description>Background:
Whether listening to background music enhances verbal learning performance is still disputed. In this study we investigated the influence of listening to background music on verbal learning performance and the associated brain activations.
Methods:
Musical excerpts were composed for this study to ensure that they were unknown to the subjects and designed to vary in tempo (fast vs. slow) and consonance (in-tune vs. out-of-tune). Noise was used as control stimulus. 75 subjects were randomly assigned to one of five groups and learned the presented verbal material (non-words with and without semantic connotation) with and without background music. Each group was exposed to one of five different background stimuli (in-tune fast, in-tune slow, out-of-tune fast, out-of-tune slow, and noise). As dependent variable, the number of learned words was used. In addition, event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (ERS) of the EEG alpha-band were calculated as a measure for cortical activation.
Results:
We did not find any substantial and consistent influence of background music on verbal learning. There was neither an enhancement nor a decrease in verbal learning performance during the background stimulation conditions. We found however a stronger event-related desynchronization around 800 - 1200 ms after word presentation for the group exposed to in-tune fast music while they learned the verbal material. There was also a stronger event-related synchronization for the group exposed to out-of-tune fast music around 1600 - 2000 ms after word presentation.
Conclusion:
Verbal learning during the exposure to different background music varying in tempo and consonance did not influence learning of verbal material. There was neither an enhancing nor a detrimental effect on verbal learning performance. The EEG data suggest that the different acoustic background conditions evoke different cortical activations. The reason for these different cortical activations is unclear. The most plausible reason is that when background music draws more attention verbal learning performance is kept constant by the recruitment of compensatory mechanisms.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Lutz Jancke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pascale Sandmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2010, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-6-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-6-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/55">
        <title>The effects of background white noise on memory performance in inattentive school children</title>
        <description>Background:
Noise is typically conceived of as being detrimental for cognitive performance; however, a recent computational model based on the concepts of stochastic resonance and dopamine related internal noise postulates that a moderate amount of auditive noise benefit individuals in hypodopaminergic states. On the basis of this model we predicted that inattentive children would be enhanced by adding background white noise while attentive children&apos;s performance would deteriorate.
Methods:
Fifty-one secondary school pupils carried out an episodic verbal free recall test in two noise conditions. In the high noise condition, verb-noun sentences were presented during auditory background noise (white noise, 78 dB), and in the low noise condition sentences were presented without noise.
Results:
Exposure to background noise improved performance for inattentive children and worsened performance for attentive children and eliminated episodic memory differences between attentive and inattentive school children.
Conclusions:
Consistent with the model, our data show that cognitive performance can be moderated by external background white noise stimulation in a non-clinical group of inattentive participants. This finding needs replicating in a larger sample using more noise levels but if replicated has great practical applications by offering a non-invasive way to improve school results in children with attentional problems.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/55</link>
                <dc:creator>Goran Soderlund</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sverker Sikstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Loftesnes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edmund Sonuga-Barke</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2010, null:55</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-09-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-6-55</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-6-55-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-09-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/8/1/3">
        <title>The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages</title>
        <description>Background:
Both reading words and text in Arabic is slower than in other languages, even among skilled native Arabic speakers Previously we have shown that the right hemisphere (RH) had difficulty in matching Arabic letters, and suggested that it cannot contribute to word recognition in Arabic. In this study we tested this finding directly.MethodWe used the Divided Visual Field (DVF) lexical decision (LD) paradigm to assess hemispheric function during reading. The experiment had two conditions (unilateral and bilateral). In the unilateral condition, the target stimulus was presented unilaterally to the left or the right visual field. In the bilateral condition two stimuli were presented simultaneously, and participants were cued as to which one was the target. Three groups of participants were tested: Arabic speakers, Hebrew speakers, and English speakers. Each group was tested in their native language.
Results:
For Hebrew and English speakers, performance in both visual fields was significantly better in the unilateral than in the bilateral condition. For Arabic speakers, performance in the right visual field (RVF, where stimuli are presented directly to the left hemisphere) did not change in the two conditions. Performance in the LVF (when stimuli are presented directly to the right hemisphere) was at chance level in the bilateral condition, but not in the unilateral condition.
Conclusion:
We interpret these data as supporting the hypothesis that in English and Hebrew, both hemispheres are involved in LD, whereas in Arabic, the right hemisphere is not involved in word recognition.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/8/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Raphiq Ibrahim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zohar Eviatar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-8-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-8-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/44">
        <title>Mercury exposure, nutritional deficiencies and metabolic disruptions may affect learning in children</title>
        <description>Among dietary factors, learning and behavior are influenced not only by nutrients, but also by exposure to toxic food contaminants such as mercury that can disrupt metabolic processes and alter neuronal plasticity. Neurons lacking in plasticity are a factor in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and mental retardation. Essential nutrients help maintain normal neuronal plasticity. Nutritional deficiencies, including deficiencies in the long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, the amino acid methionine, and the trace minerals zinc and selenium, have been shown to influence neuronal function and produce defects in neuronal plasticity, as well as impact behavior in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Nutritional deficiencies and mercury exposure have been shown to alter neuronal function and increase oxidative stress among children with autism. These dietary factors may be directly related to the development of behavior disorders and learning disabilities. Mercury, either individually or in concert with other factors, may be harmful if ingested in above average amounts or by sensitive individuals. High fructose corn syrup has been shown to contain trace amounts of mercury as a result of some manufacturing processes, and its consumption can also lead to zinc loss. Consumption of certain artificial food color additives has also been shown to lead to zinc deficiency. Dietary zinc is essential for maintaining the metabolic processes required for mercury elimination. Since high fructose corn syrup and artificial food color additives are common ingredients in many foodstuffs, their consumption should be considered in those individuals with nutritional deficits such as zinc deficiency or who are allergic or sensitive to the effects of mercury or unable to effectively metabolize and eliminate it from the body.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/44</link>
                <dc:creator>Renee Dufault</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roseanne Schnoll</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Walter Lukiw</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Blaise LeBlanc</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Cornett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lyn Patrick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Wallinga</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Gilbert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raquel Crider</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, null:44</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-44</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-5-44-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/20">
        <title>An open trial assessment of &quot;The Number Race&quot;, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia</title>
        <description>Background:
In a companion article 1, we described the development and evaluation of software designed to remediate dyscalculia. This software is based on the hypothesis that dyscalculia is due to a &quot;core deficit&quot; in number sense or in its access via symbolic information. Here we review the evidence for this hypothesis, and present results from an initial open-trial test of the software in a sample of nine 7&#8211;9 year old children with mathematical difficulties.
Methods:
Children completed adaptive training on numerical comparison for half an hour a day, four days a week over a period of five-weeks. They were tested before and after intervention on their performance in core numerical tasks: counting, transcoding, base-10 comprehension, enumeration, addition, subtraction, and symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison.
Results:
Children showed specific increases in performance on core number sense tasks. Speed of subitizing and numerical comparison increased by several hundred msec. Subtraction accuracy increased by an average of 23%. Performance on addition and base-10 comprehension tasks did not improve over the period of the study.
Conclusion:
Initial open-trial testing showed promising results, and suggested that the software was successful in increasing number sense over the short period of the study. However these results need to be followed up with larger, controlled studies. The issues of transfer to higher-level tasks, and of the best developmental time window for intervention also need to be addressed.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Anna Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susannah Revkin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Cohen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laurent Cohen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stanislas Dehaene</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2006, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-2-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-2-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/24">
        <title>Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data</title>
        <description>Background:
Previous lesion, electrical self-stimulation and drug addiction studies suggest that the midbrain dopamine systems are parts of the reward system of the brain. This review provides an updated overview about the basic signals of dopamine neurons to environmental stimuli.
Methods:
The described experiments used standard behavioral and neurophysiological methods to record the activity of single dopamine neurons in awake monkeys during specific behavioral tasks.
Results:
Dopamine neurons show phasic activations to external stimuli. The signal reflects reward, physical salience, risk and punishment, in descending order of fractions of responding neurons. Expected reward value is a key decision variable for economic choices. The reward response codes reward value, probability and their summed product, expected value. The neurons code reward value as it differs from prediction, thus fulfilling the basic requirement for a bidirectional prediction error teaching signal postulated by learning theory. This response is scaled in units of standard deviation. By contrast, relatively few dopamine neurons show the phasic activation following punishers and conditioned aversive stimuli, suggesting a lack of relationship of the reward response to general attention and arousal. Large proportions of dopamine neurons are also activated by intense, physically salient stimuli. This response is enhanced when the stimuli are novel; it appears to be distinct from the reward value signal. Dopamine neurons show also unspecific activations to non-rewarding stimuli that are possibly due to generalization by similar stimuli and pseudoconditioning by primary rewards. These activations are shorter than reward responses and are often followed by depression of activity. A separate, slower dopamine signal informs about risk, another important decision variable. The prediction error response occurs only with reward; it is scaled by the risk of predicted reward.
Conclusions:
Neurophysiological studies reveal phasic dopamine signals that transmit information related predominantly but not exclusively to reward. Although not being entirely homogeneous, the dopamine signal is more restricted and stereotyped than neuronal activity in most other brain structures involved in goal directed behavior.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Wolfram Schultz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2010, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-6-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-6-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-04-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/31">
        <title>Cognitive development in children with chronic protein energy malnutrition </title>
        <description>Background:
Malnutrition is associated with both structural and functional pathology of the brain. A wide range of cognitive deficits has been reported in malnourished children. Effect of chronic protein energy malnutrition (PEM) causing stunting and wasting in children could also affect the ongoing development of higher cognitive processes during childhood (&gt;5 years of age). The present study examined the effect of stunted growth on the rate of development of cognitive processes using neuropsychological measures.
Methods:
Twenty children identified as malnourished and twenty as adequately nourished in the age groups of 5&#8211;7 years and 8&#8211;10 years were examined. NIMHANS neuropsychological battery for children sensitive to the effects of brain dysfunction and age related improvement was employed. The battery consisted of tests of motor speed, attention, visuospatial ability, executive functions, comprehension and learning and memory
Results:
Development of cognitive processes appeared to be governed by both age and nutritional status. Malnourished children performed poor on tests of attention, working memory, learning and memory and visuospatial ability except on the test of motor speed and coordination. Age related improvement was not observed on tests of design fluency, working memory, visual construction, learning and memory in malnourished children. However, age related improvement was observed on tests of attention, visual perception, and verbal comprehension in malnourished children even though the performance was deficient as compared to the performance level of adequately nourished children.
Conclusion:
Chronic protein energy malnutrition (stunting) affects the ongoing development of higher cognitive processes during childhood years rather than merely showing a generalized cognitive impairment. Stunting could result in slowing in the age related improvement in certain and not all higher order cognitive processes and may also result in long lasting cognitive impairments.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/31</link>
                <dc:creator>Bhoomika Kar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shobini Rao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>B Chandramouli</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, null:31</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-07-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-31</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-4-31-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-07-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/46">
        <title>Mathematics anxiety in children with developmental dyscalculia</title>
        <description>Background:
Math anxiety, defined as a negative affective response to mathematics, is known to have deleterious effects on math performance in the general population. However, the assumption that math anxiety is directly related to math performance, has not yet been validated. Thus, our primary objective was to investigate the effects of math anxiety on numerical processing in children with specific deficits in the acquisition of math skills (Developmental Dyscalculia; DD) by using a novel affective priming task as an indirect measure.
Methods:
Participants (12 children with DD and 11 typically-developing peers) completed a novel priming task in which an arithmetic equation was preceded by one of four types of priming words (positive, neutral, negative or related to mathematics). Children were required to indicate whether the equation (simple math facts based on addition, subtraction, multiplication or division) was true or false. Typically, people respond to target stimuli more quickly after presentation of an affectively-related prime than after one that is unrelated affectively.ResultParticipants with DD responded faster to targets that were preceded by both negative primes and math-related primes. A reversed pattern was present in the control group.
Conclusion:
These results reveal a direct link between emotions, arithmetic and low achievement in math. It is also suggested that arithmetic-affective priming might be used as an indirect measure of math anxiety.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/46</link>
                <dc:creator>Orly Rubinsten</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosemary Tannock</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2010, null:46</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-6-46</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-6-46-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>46</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/8/1/16">
        <title>Children with Usher syndrome: mental and behavioral disorders</title>
        <description>Background:
Mental and behavioral disorders among adults with Usher syndrome have been discussed and reported in some case studies but no research has been reported on children with Usher syndrome.
Methods:
This article investigates the prevalence and characteristics of mental and behavioral disorders among 26 children, 3-17 years of age, with Usher syndrome.
Results:
Six of the 26 children were diagnosed with a mental or behavioral disorder (1 with schizophrenia and mild mental retardation, 1 with atypical autism and severe mental retardation, 1 with atypical autism and mild mental retardation, 1 with mild mental retardation, and 2 with conduct disorder). Another 3 children had had a mental or behavioral disorder previously in their childhood.
Conclusion:
Even though vision impairment first manifests in late childhood, some children with Usher syndrome seem to develop mental and behavioral disorders during childhood. The aetiology and treatment of mental and behavioral disorders among children with Usher syndrome are discussed. Children with Usher syndrome and their parents may need clinical support during early childhood to prevent development of mental and behavioral disorders.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/8/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Jesper Dammeyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2012, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-8-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-8-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/15">
        <title>What would Karl Popper say? Are current psychological theories of ADHD falsifiable?</title>
        <description>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common and highly heritable neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorder. Here, we critically review four major psychological theories of ADHD &#8211; the Executive Dysfunction, the State Regulation, the Delay Aversion and the Dynamic Developmental &#8211; on their abilities to explain all the symptoms of ADHD, their testability and their openness to falsification. We conclude that theoreticians should focus, to a greater extent than currently practiced, on developing refutable theories of ADHD.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Katherine Johnson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Wiersema</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jonna Kuntsi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-9081-5-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

