<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Behavioral and Brain Functions - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Behavioral and Brain Functions</description>
        <dc:date>2009-07-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/27" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/18" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/27">
        <title>I know where you&apos;ll look: an fMRI study of oculomotor intention and a change of motor plan</title>
        <description>Background:
Electrophysiological studies in monkeys showed that the intention to perform a saccade and the covert change in motor plan are reflected in the neural activity of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC).
Methods:
To investigate whether such covert intentional processes are demonstrable in humans as well we used event related functional MRI. Subjects were instructed to fixate a central target, which changed its color in order to indicate the direction of a subsequent saccade. Unexpectedly for the subjects, the color changed again in half of the trials to instruct a spatially opposite saccade.
Results:
The double-cue induced synergistic and prolonged signals in early visual areas, the motion specific visual area V5, PPC, and the supplementary and frontal eye field. At the single subject level it became evident that the PPC split up in two separate subareas. In the posterior region, the signal change correlated with the change in motor plan: activation strongly decreased when the cue instructed an ipsiversive saccade while it strongly increased when it instructed a contraversive saccade. In the anterior region, the signal change was motor related irrespective of the spatial direction of the upcoming saccade.
Conclusions:
Thus, the human PPC holds at least two different areas for planning and executing saccadic eye movements.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/27</link>
                <dc:creator>Raimund Kleiser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christina Konen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rudiger Seitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Bremmer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:27</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-27</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/26">
        <title>Abnormal auditory ERP N100 in children with dyslexia: comparison with their control siblings</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent research has implicated deficits of the working memory (WM) and attention in dyslexia. The N100 component of event-related potentials (ERP) is thought to reflect attention and working memory operation. However, previous studies showed controversial results concerning the N100 in dyslexia. Variability in this issue may be the result of inappropriate match up of the control sample, which is usually based exclusively on age and gender.
Methods:
In order to address this question the present study aimed at investigating the auditory N100 component elicited during a WM test in 38 dyslexic children in comparison to those of 19 unaffected sibling controls. Both groups met the criteria of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). ERP were evoked by two stimuli, a low (500Hz) and a high (3000Hz) frequency tone indicating forward and reverse digit span respectively.
Results:
As compared to their sibling controls, dyslexic children exhibited significantly reduced N100 amplitudes induced by both reverse and forward digit span at Fp1, F3, Fp2, Fz, C4, Cz and F4 and at Fp1, F3, C5, C3, Fz, F4, C6, P4 and Fp2 leads respectively. Memory performance of the dyslexics group was not significantly lower than that of the controls. However, enhanced memory performance in the control group is associated with increased N100 amplitude induced by high frequency stimuli at the C5, C3, C6 and P4 leads and increased N100 amplitude induced by low frequency stimuli at the P4 lead.
Conclusions:
The present findings are in support of the notion of weakened capture of auditory attention in dyslexia, allowing for a possible impairment in the dynamics that link attention with short memory, suggested by the anchoring-deficit hypothesis.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Charalabos Papageorgiou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giorgos Giannakakis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Konstantina Nikita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dimitris Anagnostopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Papadimitriou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andreas Rabavilas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-26</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/25">
        <title>A no-go related prefrontal negativity larger to irrelevant stimuli that are difficult to suppress</title>
        <description>Background:
There is a wide debate in the literature about whether N2/P3 effects in no-go trials reflect the inhibition of an intended action, or the absence of a negative movement-related potential typical of go trials. The aim of this study was to provide an objective measure of the suppression of irrelevant information (in a conjoined selective visual attention task) under conditions that were perfectly comparable from the viewpoint of the motoric processes involved.
Methods:
Twenty-nine right-handed students took part in the study. Their EEGs were recorded from 128 scalp sites while they viewed gratings of four different spatial frequencies (from 0.75 to 6 c/deg) randomly flashed in the four upper and lower quadrants of the visual field. The tasks consisted of attending and responding to a conjunction of spatial frequency and space location. Intermediate frequencies (1.5 and 3 c/deg) acted as distracters or lures. Analysis of the ERPs elicited by the same physical stimulus, close in spatial frequency to the actual target and falling within the attended quadrant (pseudo-target) vs. a non-target location, allowed us to identify the time course and neural bases of brain activation during the suppression of irrelevant information.
Results:
FAs were on average 9% for pseudo-targets and 0.2% for other types of lures, indicating that the former were more difficult to suppress. Target-related ERP components (occipito/temporal selection negativity, posterior P3b and precentral motor N2) were greater to pseudo-targets than other distracters. A large prefrontal negativity (370-430 ms) was also identified, much larger to pseudo-targets than non-targets (and absent in response to real targets), thus reflecting response inhibition and top-down cognitive control processes.
Conclusions:
A LORETA inverse solution identified the neural generators of this effect in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPF), left and right fusiform gyri and bilateral superior temporal cortices. The tentative hypothesis is advanced that these activations might reflect the modulatory effects exerted by the fronto/temporal circuit for the suppression of irrelevant information.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Alice Proverbio</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marzia Del Zotto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicola Crotti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alberto Zani</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-25</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/24">
        <title>Cross-fostering does not alter the neurochemistry or behavior of spontaneously hypertensive rats</title>
        <description>Background:
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly heritable developmental disorder resulting from complex gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. The most widely used animal model, the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), displays the major symptoms of ADHD (deficits in attention, impulsivity and hyperactivity) and has a disturbance in the noradrenergic system when compared to control Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). The aim of the present study was to determine whether the ADHD-like characteristics of SHR were purely genetically determined or dependent on the gene-environment interaction provided by the SHR dam.
Methods:
SHR/NCrl (Charles River, USA), WKY/NCrl (Charles River, USA) and Sprague Dawley rats (SD/Hsd, Harlan, UK) were bred at the University of Cape Town. Rat pups were cross-fostered on postnatal day 2 (PND 2). Control rats remained with their birth mothers to serve as a reference for their particular strain phenotype. Behavior in the open-field and the elevated-plus maze was assessed between PND 29 and 33. Two days after the behavioral recordings, rats were decapitated and glutamate-stimulated release of [3H]norepinephrine was determined in prefrontal cortex and hippocampal slices.
Results:
There was no significant effect of &quot;strain of dam&quot; but there was a significant effect of &quot;pup strain&quot; on all parameters investigated. SHR pups travelled a greater distance in the open field, spent a longer period of time in the inner zone and entered the inner zone of the open-field more frequently than SD or WKY. SD were more active than WKY in the open-field. WKY took longer to enter the inner zone than SHR or SD. In the elevated-plus maze, SHR spent less time in the closed arms, more time in the open arms and entered the open arms more frequently than SD or WKY. There was no difference between WKY and SD behavior in the elevated-plus maze. SHR released significantly more [3H]norepinephrine in response to glutamate than SD or WKY in both hippocampus and prefrontal cortex while SD prefrontal cortex released more [3H]norepinephrine than WKY. SHR were resilient, cross-fostering did not reduce their ADHD-like behaviour or change their neurochemistry. Cross-fostering of SD pups onto SHR or WKY dams increased their exploratory behavior without altering their anxiety-like behavior.
Conclusions:
The ADHD-like behaviour of SHR and their neurochemistry is genetically determined and not dependent on nurturing by SHR dams. The similarity between WKY and SD supports the continued use of WKY as a control for SHR and suggests that SD may be a useful additional reference strain for SHR. The fact that SD behaved similarly to WKY in the elevated-plus maze argues against the use of WKY as a model for anxiety-like disorders.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Fleur Howells</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leander Bindewald</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vivienne Russell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/23">
        <title>Adolescent ethanol experience alters immediate and long-term behavioral responses to ethanol odor in observer and demonstrator rats.</title>
        <description>Background:
The social transmission of food preference paradigm centers on the finding that observers obtain dietary information through olfactory cues on the breath of a demonstrator peer that has ingested a novel substance. This phenomenon plays a role in ethanol acceptability. Historically, studies using this technique have focused on observer animals in order to study the social transmission process. With respect to ethanol, studies of acute intoxication have shown that the pharmacologic properties of ethanol and hematogenic olfaction can influence the subsequent ethanol odor-mediated responses of the intoxicated animals. These acute studies, however, demonstrate odor aversion. The present study compared the effect of adolescent ethanol exposure, via the social transmission paradigm, on the behavioral response to ethanol odor in both observer and demonstrator animals in adolescence (postnatal day (P) 37) and the persistence of these effects into adulthood (P90).
Methods:
Beginning on P29, na&#239;ve rats received four ethanol or water exposures: one every 48 hours through either direct intragastric infusion or social interaction with an infused peer. The reflexive sniffing response of observers and demonstrators to ethanol odor was tested at P37 or P90 using whole-body plethysmography.
Results:
The behavioral response of adolescent ethanol observers and demonstrators significantly differed between themselves and from their respective water controls. Ethanol and water observers both displayed a greater response to ethanol odor than their respective demonstrator counterparts. Compared to controls, both modes of ethanol exposure produced similar magnitudes of enhancement. At P90, both forms of exposure displayed similar responses to ethanol odor and similar magnitudes of enhancement. Only demonstrators displayed equivalent enhanced responses in both sexes.
Conclusion:
In contrast to previous studies showing odor aversion following acute ethanol intoxication, within the context of the social transmission paradigm, adolescent demonstrators like observers showed an enhanced behavioral response to ethanol odor. The differential enhanced odor response between observers and demonstrators, despite similar net enhancements relative to controls, suggests the presence of a stress effect from the infusion technique. This finding contrasts previous suggestions that intragastric infusions create minimal stress: an important consideration when conducting ethanol research. This stress effect appears to ameliorate by adulthood.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Amber Eade</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Youngentob</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-23</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/22">
        <title>The Motor Function Neurological Assessment (MFNU) as an indicator of motor function problems in boys with ADHD</title>
        <description>Background:
The paper presents the Motor Function Neurological Assessment (MFNU), as a tool for identifying typical motor function problems in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The study investigated motor functions in boys diagnosed with Hyperkinetic Disorder (HKD, F.90.0). HKD corresponds to the ADHD-combined (ADHD-C) diagnosis in the DSM-IV. The paper addresses the ability of the instrument to discriminate between non-medicated boys with HKD and a control group consisting of normal non-referred boys without any clinical significant ADHD symptoms.
Methods:
25 drug-na&#239;ve boys, aged 8&#8211;12 years and recently diagnosed as HKD F90.0, were compared with 27 controls, all boys in the same age range, on 17 MFNU subtests, and with a &apos;Total score&apos; parameter.
Results:
On the individual subtests 80&#8211;96% (median 88%) of the ADHD group showed &apos;moderate&apos; to &apos;severe&apos; problems, compared to 0&#8211;44% (median 14.8%) within the control group. The percentage of &apos;severe problems&apos; ranged from 44&#8211;84%, (median 64%) in the ADHD group, and 0&#8211;44% (median 0%) in the control group. The highly significant differences found between the groups on all subtests, and on the Total score scores, indicated that the MFNU had a high discriminative power when children with ADHD and normal controls were compared. The Total score parameter seemed to be a meaningful discriminator of a common underlying factor of the 17 subtests used in the study.
Conclusion:
The study confirms our clinical findings that the MFNU measures a consistent pattern of motor function problems in children with HKD, and that these problems are rarely represented in individuals without ADHD. Further research is needed to investigate to what extent the MFNU taps motor problems that are truly specific to ADHD, in contrast to motor problems common to children with DCD or other clinical problems.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Liv Stray</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Torstein Stray</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Synnove Iversen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Ruud</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bjorn Ellertsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Finn Egil Tonnessen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-22</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/21">
        <title>Methylphenidate improves motor functions in children diagnosed with Hyperkinetic Disorder</title>
        <description>Background:
A previous study showed that a high percentage of children diagnosed with Hyperkinetic Disorder (HKD) displayed a consistent pattern of motor function problems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of methylphenidate (MPH) on such motor performance in children with HKD
Methods:
25 drug-na&#239;ve boys, aged 8&#8211;12 yr with a HKD-F90.0 diagnosis, were randomly assigned into two groups within a double blind cross-over design, and tested with a motor assessment instrument, during MPH and placebo conditions.
Results:
The percentage of MFNU scores in the sample indicating &apos;severe motor problems&apos; ranged from 44&#8211;84%, typically over 60%. Highly significant improvements in motor performance were observed with MPH compared to baseline ratings on all the 17 subtests of the MFNU 1&#8211;2 hr after administration of MPH. There were no significant placebo effects. The motor improvement was consistent with improvement of clinical symptoms.
Conclusion:
The study confirmed our prior clinical observations showing that children with ADHD typically demonstrate marked improvements of motor functions after a single dose of 10 mg MPH. The most pronounced positive MPH response was seen in subtests measuring either neuromotor inhibition, or heightened muscular tone in the gross movement muscles involved in maintaining the alignment and balance of the body. Introduction of MPH generally led to improved balance and a generally more coordinated and controlled body movement.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Liv Stray</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Torstein Stray</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Synnove Iversen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Ruud</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bjorn Ellertsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-21</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/20">
        <title>Hyperresponsiveness to social rewards in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)</title>
        <description>Background:
Current research suggests that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with larger behavioral sensitivity to reinforcement contingencies. However, most studies have focused thus far on the enhancing effects of tangible rewards such as money, neglecting that social-emotional stimuli may also impact task performance in ADHD patients.
Methods:
To determine whether non-social (monetary) and social (positive facial expressions) rewards differentially improve response inhibition accuracy in children and adolescents with ADHD, we applied an incentive go/no-go task with reward contingencies for successful inhibition and compared ADHD subjects with typically developing individuals.
Results:
Both social and monetary contingencies improved inhibition accuracy in all participants. However, individuals with ADHD displayed a particularly higher profit from social reward than healthy controls, suggesting that cognitive control in ADHD patients can be specifically improved by social reinforcement. By contrast, self-rated motivation associated with task performance was significantly lower in ADHD patients.
Conclusion:
Our findings provide evidence for hyperresponsiveness to social rewards in ADHD patients, which is accompanied by limited self-awareness. These data suggest that social reward procedures may be particularly useful in behavioral interventions in children with ADHD.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Gregor Kohls</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kerstin Konrad</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-20</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/19">
        <title>Nicotine-induced brain metabolism associated with anger provocation </title>
        <description>Cortico-limbic brain activity associated with anger may be susceptible to nicotine and, thus, may contribute to smoking initiation and nicotine addiction. The purpose of the study was to identify the brain regions that are most reactive to nicotine and show the greatest association with anger task performance. Twenty adult nonsmokers (9 women, 11 men) participated in two laboratory sessions to assess brain metabolism with fluoro deoxy-glucose Positron Emission Topography (FDG-PET) in response to nicotine and placebo patches during an anger provocation task. Outcome variables for the anger provocation task were reaction time, intensity and length of retaliation. Reaction time was associated with nicotine-induced changes in the left thalamus. Length of retaliation was associated with a functionally linked set of cortical and subcortical structures such as right frontal lobe, right anterior cingulate (BA 24), right uncus, left parietal lobe, left BA 11, left cingulate, left BA 25, left amygdala, left BA 30, left BA 38 and BA 9. These findings reveal the underlying brain circuitry targeted by nicotine during anger provocation.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Jean Gehricke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Potkin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frances Leslie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandra Loughlin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Whalen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Larry Jamner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Mbogori</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Fallon</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-19</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/18">
        <title>Coincident frequencies and relative phases among brain activity and hormonal signals</title>
        <description>Background:
Fourier transform is a basic tool for analyzing biological signals and is computed for a finite sequence of data sample. The electroencephalographic (EEG) signals analyzed with this method provide only information based on the frequency range, for short periods. In some cases, for long periods it can be useful to know whether EEG signals coincide or have a relative phase between them or with other biological signals. Some studies have evidenced that sex hormones and EEG signals show oscillations in their frequencies across a period of 28 days; so it seems of relevance to seek after possible patterns relating EEG signals and endogenous sex hormones, assumed as long time-periodic functions to determine their typical periods, frequencies and relative phases.
Methods:
In this work we propose a method that can be used to analyze brain signals and hormonal levels and obtain frequencies and relative phases among them. This method involves the application of a discrete Fourier Transform on previously reported datasets of absolute power of brain signals delta, theta, alpha1, alpha2, beta1 and beta2 and the endogenous estrogen and progesterone levels along 28 days.
Results:
Applying the proposed method to exemplary datasets and comparing each brain signal with both sex hormones signals, we found a characteristic profile of coincident periods and typical relative phases. For the corresponding coincident periods the progesterone seems to be essentially in phase with theta, alpha1, alpha2 and beta1, while delta and beta2 go oppositely. For the relevant coincident periods, the estrogen goes in phase with delta and theta and goes oppositely with alpha2.
Conclusion:
Findings suggest that the procedure applied here provides a method to analyze typical frequencies, or periods and phases between signals with the same period. It generates specific patterns for brain signals and hormones and relations among them.</description>
        <link>http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Silvia Solis-Ortiz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rafael Campos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julian Felix</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Octavio Obregon</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Behavioral and Brain Functions</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-9081</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
